Government debt (% of GDP)

What the government owes, measured against the size of the whole economy.

Concern
95.2 % of GDP
Improving−1.6 pts vs a year ago

Source: International Monetary Fund · As of 2026 · Provisional · View source

Year range 2000 – 2026

Chart of Government debt (% of GDP) over time. 79.2 % of GDP (2000) → 95.2 % of GDP (2026).

Table
Period% of GDP
2000 79.2
2001 84.4
2002 96.3
2003 86.5
2004 86.5
2005 76.6
2006 74.3
2007 71.8
2008 68.8
2009 72.8
2010 68.7
2011 69.4
2012 67.5
2013 69.5
2014 69.6
2015 76.3
2016 75.0
2017 72.3
2018 83.6
2019 82.6
2020 96.9
2021 102.7
2022 115.9
2023 109.9
2024 100.2
2025 96.8
2026 95.2*
Sri Lanka's current situation

Government debt was 95.2 % of GDP in 2026, -1.6 % of GDP versus a year earlier and -7.4 % of GDP over five years. Current status: Concern. Healthy range: Reference points include the Maastricht 60% and the IMF's sustainability frameworks. Below 60% is Good, 60–90% Watch, above 90% Concern — though safe levels are lower for developing economies that borrow in foreign currency. Compared with peers — Bangladesh: 31.2 · India: 46.5.

What is it?

Debt-to-GDP compares the government's total debt with one year of the country's output. Formula: gross general government debt ÷ nominal GDP × 100. A big economy can carry more debt than a small one, so the ratio matters more than the raw amount.

A simple example

If the government owes Rs 100 and the economy produces Rs 100 a year, debt-to-GDP is 100%. Like a household, it is not just how much you owe but how much you earn.

What happens when it is high

High debt means a large share of revenue goes to interest instead of schools, hospitals or roads. Lenders may demand higher rates, and a loss of confidence can trigger a debt crisis or default — as Sri Lanka experienced in 2022. The burden falls on taxpayers and public services.

What happens when it is low

Low debt gives a government room to borrow in a crisis and invest for the future. But very low debt can also signal under-investment — borrowing to build productive infrastructure can be worthwhile.

What is a healthy range

Reference points include the Maastricht 60% and the IMF's sustainability frameworks. Below 60% is Good, 60–90% Watch, above 90% Concern — though safe levels are lower for developing economies that borrow in foreign currency.

Maastricht 60% reference; IMF DSA risk ~90% for EMs.

What might happen next

Official projections

SourceYear% of GDP
International Monetary Fund 2027 91.8
International Monetary Fund 2028 90.1
International Monetary Fund 2029 87.4
International Monetary Fund 2030 84.7
International Monetary Fund 2031 82.4

Simple statistical trend

A simple statistical trend, not a prediction of what will happen. Forecasts are uncertain and are not financial advice.

Upside: growth, higher revenue, a stronger rupee and the IMF programme lower the ratio. Downside: slow growth, weak revenue, currency depreciation or new borrowing raise it. Not financial advice.

A simple statistical trend, not a prediction of what will happen. Forecasts are uncertain and are not financial advice.

For experts

Debt sustainability shapes interest payments, taxes, the currency and access to borrowing. It was at the centre of the 2022 crisis and the IMF programme.

How we calculate this

Gross general government debt as a percentage of nominal GDP (IMF). Annual.

Learn more